Sexuality and sexual health of Canadian adolescents:
Yesterday, today and tomorrow
Eleanor Maticka-Tyndale
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Windsor,
Windsor, ON
A profile of the sexual health and behaviours of contemporary Canadian
adolescents is developed based on current research and compared
to adolescents in the latter half of the 20th century. While notable
changes occurred in the sexual lives of youth between the late 1950s
and the early 1990s, the patterns of behaviour established in the
latter part of the 20th century, have continued into recent years.
There is strong evidence that today’s youth are experiencing
better sexual health and taking more measures to protect their sexual
health than prior generations of youth did. However, problems remain.
Canadian teens and young adults continue to be challenged by STIs;
many GLBTQ youth continue to face homonegativity and discrimination
in their schools and communities; youth living in poverty, in rural
areas and aboriginal youth carry the greatest burdens of poor sexual
health and are the most poorly served by sexuality education and
sexual health care. Recommendations are made to strengthen both
sexuality education and sexual health services to meet the needs
of all Canadian youth (The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality,
2008; 17: 85-95).
Characteristics of Canadian youth reporting a very
early age of first sexual intercourse
William F. Boyce¹, Owen Gallup¹, and Stevenson Fergus²
¹Social Program Evaluation Group, Queen’s University,
Kingston, ON
² School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University,
Kingston, ON
The present study examined the correlates of having experienced
first sexual intercourse (FSI) at a very early age using a large,
national classroom sample of Canadian adolescents from the Canadian
Youth, Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Study (Boyce et al., 2003). Most
of the available studies on this topic have divided adolescent respondents
into categories of “early” and “late” based
on the average age of first intercourse. As a result, a portion
of the young people identified in these studies as having had “early”
first sexual intercourse had actually done so at an age when intercourse
would have been becoming normative. The large size of the present
sample of adolescents (n=2301; mean age 15.8 years) provided enough
males and females who had non-normative very early FSI to compare
them with peers who had first intercourse later. Associations were
tested on variables in four conceptual categories: family relationships;
psychological factors; peers and risk-taking; and partner-related
factors. A very early age of FSI (defined as 11 years or less for
males and 12 years or less for females), was associated with having
experienced pressure to have unwanted sex, having used drugs other
than marijuana, and believing that popularity at school is dependent
upon rebelling/breaking the rules. While the retrospective nature
of our cross-sectional analysis precludes assigning directionality
of influences, the possible predictive value of the findings, including
the influence of “fitting in” with peers, is considered
in relation to future research on this topic (The Canadian Journal
of Human Sexuality, 2008; 17:
97-108).
Difficulties with sexual functioning in a sample
of male and female late adolescent and young adult university students
Lucia F. O’Sullivan¹ and JoAnn Majerovich²
¹Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton,
NB
²University of New Brunswick Student Health Centre, Fredericton,
NB
Despite the considerable research attention given to sexual health
outcomes such as sexually transmitted infections and unwanted pregnancies
among youth, little is known about either the positive or problematic
aspects of sexual functioning in late adolescence and early young
adulthood. The current study sought to document the experience of
difficulties with sexual functioning (e.g., interest, arousal, orgasm,
pleasure, pain) in a sample of 43 male and 128 female participants
(mean age 19.5 years; range 17 to 21). Questionnaire responses indicated
high levels of positive desire, pleasure and satisfaction, but also
lifetime experiences of a range of sexual difficulties or problems.
A comparison of these responses with those from an older sample
of 28 male and 65 female students aged 22 to 28 years, recruited
for this purpose, showed very few differences suggesting that the
foundations for sexual functioning may be established early in the
sexual lives of young people. In-depth interview findings from a
sub-sample of 30 of the 171 younger students indicated that the
sexual difficulties they experienced appeared to significantly disrupt
sexual and relationship functioning. The implications of the findings
for promoting healthy sexual functioning among young people are
discussed (The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 2008; 17:
109-122).
Stigma management? The links between enacted stigma
and teen pregnancy trends among gay, lesbian, and bisexual students
in British Columbia
Elizabeth M. Saewyc¹,², Colleen S. Poon², Yuko Homma1,
and Carol L. Skay³
¹University of British Columbia School of Nursing, Vancouver,
BC
²McCreary Centre Society, Vancouver, BC
³University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN,
USA
Over the past decade, several large-scale school-based studies
of adolescents in Canada and the U.S. have documented health disparities
for lesbian, gay and bisexual teens compared to their heterosexual
peers, such as higher rates of suicide attempts, homelessness, and
substance use. Many of these disparities have been linked to “enacted
stigma,” or the higher rates of harassment, discrimination,
and sexual or physical violence that sexual minority youth experience
at home, at school, and in the community. An unexpected health disparity
for lesbian, gay and bisexual youth is their significantly higher
risk of teen pregnancy involvement (between two and seven times
the rate of their heterosexual peers), especially in light of declining
trends in teen pregnancy across North America since the early 1990s.
What is behind this higher risk? Is it getting better or worse?
Using the province-wide cluster-stratified British Columbia Adolescent
Health Surveys from 1992, 1998, and 2003, this paper explores the
trends in pregnancy involvement, related sexual behaviours, and
exposure to forms of enacted stigma that may help explain this particular
health disparity for gay, lesbian and bisexual youth in Canada (The
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 2008; 17:
123-139).
Challenging ethno-cultural and sexual inequities: An
intersectional feminist analysis of teachers, health partners and
university students’ views on adolescent sexual and reproductive
health rights
Andrea Martinez¹,² and Karen P. Phillips³,4 ¹School
of International Development and Global Studies, Faculty of Social
Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON ²Institute of
Women’s Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON ³Health
Sciences Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa,
Ottawa, ON
4Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
Research on sexual health education has lacked a critical analysis
of the implementation of curricula through the lens of human rights.
Drawing on feminist theories we explore how sexual health education
incorporates the intersections of sexual and reproductive health
(SRH) with social structuring factors (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity
and sexual identities), and the role of sexual health education
in young adults’ construction and assertion of their own SRH
rights. Based on 75 interviews with teachers, health partners and
undergraduate university students from the National Capital Region,
this paper documents the tensions resulting from a biomedical, risk-centred
application of the Ontario Health and Physical Education curriculum
and the noteworthy absence of strategies to address SRH inequities
of gender, race/ethnicity and sexual identities. Despite some efforts
from the health sector to promote an SRH rights-based approach,
our findings reveal that Ottawa area teachers and young adults are
ill-equipped to articulate SRH rights, and may therefore be unable
to prevent gender stereotypic, racialized or homophobic constructions
of adolescent sexuality (The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality,
2008; 17: 141-159). |